Grigor
September 17, 2017, 9:37pm
30
Migration/tribes:
We seem to be in aggreeance! Your mentioning ā[going] 10 kilometers further and [finding] there uninhabited land, if not, then a few kilometers furtherā, is practically exactly how the Germanic peoples moved from Scandinavia southwards, or the Slavs much later, going west all the way into modern northern Germany, and south all the way into modern day central Greece. Or the Magyars, the Hungarians, coming from the east, crossing the Carpathians almost exactly a millennium ago.
Since Iāve written so little, Iāll just quote what I wrote earlier in a thread about these things:
On a macro scale, most tribes or clans that we know of, and I mean tens of thousands of them, were practically the same, especially when taking into account their biomes. Obviously the Eskimo, Akkadians or Vistulans were different, but the differences between Vistulans, Polans, Mazovians, Goplans, Lendians and other west Slavic tribesā¦? Practically nothing. They lived in practically the same environment, dealt with the same resources, made the same things, talked the same language and so forth. Look upon the Grecians of old, the Boeotians, Minyans, Argives, Arcadians, PhocÄans, Locrians and othersā¦ the fact that they went out together to burn Troy does suggest great similarities between them. Especially since Troy was similarly Grecianā¦ The Iliad struggles to establish any actual difference between them other than justā¦ happing to be living in different places. I feel therefore, that there should, most often, be very little difference between āourā tribe, and the ones close to us, or different clans or so.
Of course, there were more differences between groups of tribes or clans, āpeoplesā or something like that. After all, the differences between the West Slavs and the Germanic tribes next to them were such that the former called the latter something in the lines of āPeople who canāt speak properlyā. They still do God knows they fought endlessly for the first one and a half millennia of their being neighbours, till 1945 ADā¦ And just look at the Slavs when they came to Europe around 400-600 AD, or when the Indo-Europeans came to Europe and the Middle-East, look at the Hittites, or even the Akkadian invasion of Sumer. In those cases, I would agree that there would be differences in culture, language, religion and other matters. Not very much so in technology, even though the Indo-Europeans are said to have come mounted on horses, and excelling in the use of Ironā¦ but Iām sceptical towards two different clans in the same tribe being different from each other in abilities, unless it is more like the castes of India, with practically bred āmerchantsā or ācraftsmenā. Especially so early as the neo-lithicum and chalcolithicum
1 Like